శ్రీ. శ్రీధర్ బాబు గారికి గౌరవనీయులు మంత్రి గారు, ఐటీ మరియు కమ్యూనికేషన్ శాఖ, తెలంగాణ ప్రభుత్వం, హైదరాబాద్ విషయం: మీసేవ సేవల విస్తరణలో CSCల పాత్రపై పునఃపరిశీలన చేయవలసిన అవసరం - ప్రజల పక్షాన వినమ్ర విన్నపం. గౌరవనీయులారా, మీ సేవలను ప్రజలకు మరింత వేగంగా, సమర్థవంతంగా చేరవేయాలనే దృక్కోణంలో ఇటీవల మీసేవ కమిషనర్ గారికి CSCల ఒప్పందాన్ని రద్దు చేయమని ఇచ్చిన ఆదేశాలపై రాష్ట్రవ్యాప్తంగా CSC వీసీఎల్‌లు, గ్రామీణ ప్రజలలో ఆందోళన నెలకొంది. సత్యాన్ని తెలియజేయడమే లక్ష్యంగా, CSCలు ప్రైవేట్ సంస్థలు కాదు. ఇవి భారత ప్రభుత్వ డిజిటల్ ఇండియా కార్యక్రమంలో భాగంగా MeitY పర్యవేక్షణలో పనిచేస్తున్న ప్రభుత్వ అనుబంధ సంస్థలు (SPV) మాత్రమే. కేంద్ర ప్రభుత్వం నేరుగా CSCల నిర్వహణను పర్యవేక్షిస్తోంది. దేశవ్యాప్తంగా కోట్లాది పౌరులకు సర్వీసులను అందిస్తూ రుజువైన వేదికలు. ఇప్పటికే పలు రాష్ట్రాల్లో ప్రభుత్వ సేవలను విజయవంతంగా అందిస్తున్నాయి. ❌ “ప్రైవేటీకరణ” అనే వాదన తప్పు CSCల ద్వారా మీసేవ సేవల విస్తరణ ప్రైవేటీకరణ కాదు, ప్రజలకు మరింత సులభంగా సేవలు అందించడమే లక్ష్యం. తెలంగాణలో పరిస్థితి: ఇతర రాష్ట్రాలతో పోల్చితే తెలంగాణలో ఒక్క రాష్ట్ర ప్రభుత్వ సేవ కూడా CSCల ద్వారా అందించకపోవడం బాధాకరం. మా విన్నపం ఏమంటే: CSCలను మీసేవకు సహాయక భాగస్వామిగా గుర్తించి గ్రామీణ ప్రజలకు మరింత సులభంగా సేవలు అందించాలి ఆదాయ మార్గాలు పెరిగి, ప్రభుత్వ ఆదాయంలోనూ పెరుగుదల ఉంటుంది సర్కార్ విధానాలకు ప్రజల్లో మరింత నమ్మకం పెరుగుతుంది 📌 మా వినమ్ర అభ్యర్థన: ప్రజల అవసరాలను దృష్టిలో పెట్టుకుని, గ్రామీణ ప్రాంతాల్లో మీసేవ CSCల ద్వారా సేవల విస్తరణకు ప్రభుత్వం పునఃసమీక్ష చేయవలసిన అవసరం ఉంది. మీసేవ కమిషనర్ గారికి ఇచ్చిన ఆదేశాలను ఉపసంహరించుకుని, మీ శాఖ నేతృత్వంలో ప్రజలకు మరింత వేగంగా సేవలు అందించే నిర్ణయం తీసుకోవాలని మనవి. 20000కు పైగా CSC కుటుంబాల తరుపున, మీకు గౌరవపూర్వక విన్నపం. ప్రభుత్వ స్పందన లేకపోతే దిశల వారీగా గ్రామాల్లో మా కుటుంబాలతో సహా మా హక్కుల కోసం శాంతియుతంగా పోరాటానికి సిద్ధంగా ఉన్నాము. మీ ఆశీర్వాదంతో తెలంగాణ డిజిటల్ ప్రగతిలో భాగమవుదామని ఆకాంక్షిస్తూ.. విన్నపదారులు తెలంగాణ రాష్ట్ర CSC వీసీఎల్ సంఘం.

HYDRAA Commissioner Inspects Flood-Affected Areas as Patny Nala overflows. Hyderabad : In the wake of heavy rains lashing the city, Hyderabad Commissioner conducted a field inspection of the flood-affected areas on Thursday night . The situation turned critical after the 'Patny Nala' in Secunderabad overflowed, inundating several low-lying colonies and disrupting normal life. As a precautionary measure, the "HYDRAA Disaster Response Teams"& "Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC) launched emergency evacuation efforts. Boats were deployed to rescue stranded residents and shift them to safer locations. Authorities reported that several homes were submerged, and traffic movement was severely affected in multiple localities. The Commissioner instructed officials to remain on high alert, ensure proper drainage clearance, and provide relief support including food and temporary shelter to the affected. Citizens are advised to avoid unnecessary travel and stay updated through official alerts.

Which power do you believe is most underused in India?" Tell us why! Your voice matters more than ever. This poll isn't just a vote — it's a wake-up call. If democracy is a shared responsibility, which part are we ignoring?

Your Feedback Matters! Bharat Aawaz | BMA (Bharat Media Association) We're a Start Up Dynamic Media House With High Vision and Deep Research With Hundreds of Reports at the Ground Level. Our Mission and Motive - Every Reporter Must Be Respected and Valued Everywhere, Properly. Their Work Should Be Excellent They Should also Have the Financial Stability Must be Strong: To Build Bharat We are Different From Everything, But Still We May Miss or Overlook Something. In Building Bharat Media, We Need Your Valuble Suggestions and FeedBack Always, in Everything. If You Find Anything Good, Join Our Vision to Support Us. If You Feel We Doing Something Wrong, Please Correct Us. Bharat Aawaz and BMA - Run By Only Members, Your Feedback Matters to Us, Always. To Rate Your Feedback, Just Please Send Us a Message with Both Good and Bad. Thank You! BMA | Bharat Aawaz

Do you believe media reporters and organizations in India are fulfilling their role responsibly in questioning power and informing the public?

*Have any Question on Bharat Aawaz ? Want to Know More On Anything Specific?* We're Here to answer Every Question of You and Clear any Confusion. Please Do Remmeber, Your Question Doesn't Answer Just You - We Post Your Question to Entire Community. That Helps to Clear the Same Question or Confusion to Any Other Person Also. We Want to Build BMA Community in More Transparent and Easy Way, Not By Hiding But By Supporting. For any Question or Confusion, We're Just a Message Away! *https://wa.me/+917095669933* Waiting For It! Thank You *Bharat Aawaz*

*The Question Isn't *What* Your Title Is. The Question Is *What* You Do With It.** You are a Reporter, a Journalist, a Coordinator. But let's ask a more fundamental question: When was the last time your question made power tremble? When did a Minister, an MP, an Officer pause and realize they were truly answerable to the people you represent? The sacred duty of the Press is to be the voice of the people and a mirror to power. But we are surrounded by the ghosts of failed promises, the cunning of empty manifestos, and the deafening silence where accountability should be. **Are we really doing our job? Or are we just reporting the excuses?** At Bharat Aawaz, we don't just ask the question. We build the platform for the answer. We believe in **“संवाद से समाधान” (Samvad Se Samadhan)** — moving from mere talk to tangible transformation. **Imagine this. Not as a dream, but as our blueprint for a revolution in accountability:** You will not just 'request' an interview. You will establish **The People's Forum** in your constituency. An arena where power doesn't lecture, it listens. Where the agenda is not set by the politician, but by the public. In this arena: * You will summon the sitting MLA or MP, and alongside them, every leader who contested for the people's vote. * You will call upon every key officer responsible for the constituency's welfare. * You will come armed not with opinions, but with undeniable facts—your ammunition will be RTI replies, documented evidence, and official records. * The people are not spectators; they are the jury. You will bring forward every citizen with a grievance, a problem, or a question. * The venue will not be a sterile conference room, but the heart of the community—a local school on a Sunday, where every citizen has a front-row seat to democracy. Every three months, this People's Forum will conduct a public audit. We will ask: * What was promised for the last 90 days? * What was delivered? What is pending, and why? * What is the concrete, written plan for the next 90 days? Everything will be concluded in writing. Not a political promise, but a public commitment. This is the **Real Performance Review**, conducted by the people, for the people. This is how we make our legislative and executive systems truly answerable. Each of these local forums is a tributary, feeding the great river of change that is the national **Bharat Conclave.** So, we ask you again. Are you just a reporter? Or are you ready to be an architect of accountability? With Bharat Aawaz, you are the living embodiment of Samvad Se Samadhan.

Do you believe that giving people a platform to speak can create real change in society?

The Voice Listens Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber? One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: भारत आवाज़ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed? The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle. With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join." The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums. Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise. When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy. Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them. Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist. As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight. She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?" The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release. Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims. Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.

*కలం Vs. కవాతు (The Pen Vs. The March)* We are often told the golden rule of journalism is objectivity—to be a dispassionate chronicler of events. But in the face of profound and undeniable injustice, that rule can feel like a moral betrayal. This question is about the two souls living within you: the Journalist and the Human. Have you ever covered a story where the 'objective' truth was so monstrously unjust that the Journalist's code of dispassion felt wholly inadequate? In that moment, did you feel a pull to let the Human take over—to drop the notebook, join the protest, or use your platform not just to inform, but to actively campaign for a specific outcome? Where do you draw your personal line? Is the highest calling of your profession to create a perfect, unimpeachable record of our times, or is it to bend the arc of history, even just a little, towards justice? జర్నలిజం యొక్క స్వర్ణ సూత్రం 'నిష్పాక్షికత' అని మనకు చెబుతారు - సంఘటనలకు కేవలం నిర్లిప్త సాక్షిగా ఉండాలని. కానీ కొన్నిసార్లు దారుణమైన అన్యాయం కళ్ళముందు జరిగినప్పుడు, ఆ సూత్రం ఒక నైతిక ద్రోహంలా అనిపిస్తుంది. ఈ ప్రశ్న మీలోని రెండు ఆత్మల గురించి: పాత్రికేయుడు మరియు మానవుడు. ఒక కథను కవర్ చేస్తున్నప్పుడు, అందులోని అన్యాయం ఎంత దారుణంగా ఉందంటే, ఒక పాత్రికేయుడిగా మీరు పాటించాల్సిన నిర్లిప్తత నియమం మీకు సరిపోదనిపించిన సందర్భం ఎప్పుడైనా ఉందా? ఆ క్షణంలో, మీలోని మానవుడిని మేల్కొలపాలనిపించిందా? అంటే... నోట్‌బుక్ పక్కనపెట్టి, నిరసనలో గొంతు కలపాలని, లేదా మీ వేదికను కేవలం సమాచారం కోసమే కాకుండా, ఒక నిర్దిష్ట ఫలితం కోసం ఉద్యమించడానికే ఉపయోగించాలని అనిపించిందా? మీరు మీ గీతను ఎక్కడ గీస్తారు? మీ వృత్తి యొక్క అత్యున్నత లక్ష్యం... మన కాలానికి సంబంధించిన దోషరహితమైన రికార్డును సృష్టించడమా? లేక చరిత్ర గమనాన్ని, కొద్దిగానైనా సరే, న్యాయం వైపుకు వంచడమా?

*భారత్ Vs. ఇండియా: పాత్రికేయుని స్థానం ఎక్కడ?* ( *Bharat Vs. India: Where is the Journalist's Position?* ) In the ongoing debate between 'India' and 'Bharat', journalists are often accused of being part of an elite, out-of-touch circle. This question is about your own position in this divide. When you travel from the city to the village, from your world to theirs, do you see your primary role as being a 'voice for the voiceless', which risks speaking for them? Or is it to be a 'microphone for their voices', which requires you to step back and cede the narrative? Furthermore, how do you personally guard against your reporting becoming a form of 'extractive tourism'—where you simply take their stories of struggle for your urban audience and then leave—versus creating a space that truly reflects their agency, intelligence, and aspirations, not just their victimhood? 'ఇండియా', 'భారత్' మధ్య జరుగుతున్న ఈ చర్చలో, జర్నలిస్టులు తరచుగా వాస్తవానికి దూరంగా ఉండే ఒక ఉన్నత వర్గపు బుడగలో జీవిస్తారని ఒక విమర్శ ఉంది. ఈ ప్రశ్న ఆ విభజనలో మీ స్థానం గురించే. మీరు నగరం నుండి పల్లెకు, మీ ప్రపంచం నుండి వారి ప్రపంచంలోకి వెళ్ళినప్పుడు, మీ ప్రాథమిక పాత్ర ఏమిటి? వారి తరపున మీరే మాట్లాడే ప్రమాదాన్ని తీసుకుంటూ 'గొంతులేనివారికి గొంతుకవ్వడమా'? లేక కథనంపై పట్టు వదులుకుని, వారి గొంతులకు 'కేవలం ఒక మైక్రోఫోన్‌గా' మారడమా? ఇంకా చెప్పాలంటే, మీ రిపోర్టింగ్... కేవలం వారి కష్టాలను కథలుగా మార్చి, నగర ప్రేక్షకులకు అమ్ముకొని వెళ్ళిపోయే 'ఎక్స్‌ట్రాక్టివ్ టూరిజం' కాకుండా... వారి బాధిత్వాన్ని మాత్రమే కాకుండా వారి అస్తిత్వాన్ని, తెలివిని, ఆకాంక్షలను నిజంగా ప్రతిబింబించేలా మీరెలా జాగ్రత్తపడతారు?

నిరాశ Vs. నిరీక్షణ (Despair Vs. Hope) A journalist's primary duty is often to be a watchdog, focusing on what's broken in society: corruption, injustice, and systemic failure. After years of swimming in this river of negativity, my question is about the lens, not the story. Does the cynicism required to be a good watchdog inevitably color your entire worldview? And do you feel a professional responsibility to actively seek out and report on stories of hope, resilience, and progress—even if they don't generate the same outrage or clicks as stories of failure? In short, how do you draw the thin line between being a critic of society and becoming an enemy of its spirit? ఒక జర్నలిస్టుగా మీ ప్రాథమిక విధి, సమాజంలోని లోపాలను, అవినీతిని, అన్యాయాన్ని ఎత్తిచూపడమే. ఏళ్ల తరబడి ఈ నిరాశా నిస్పృహల ప్రవాహంలో ఈదిన తర్వాత... ప్రశ్న కథ గురించి కాదు, దాన్ని చూసే మీ కళ్ళద్దాల గురించి. వృత్తిధర్మంగా అలవడిన ఆ 'నైరాశ్యం', క్రమంగా మీ దృక్పథాన్నే మార్చేస్తుందా? మీరు చూసే ప్రతి విషయంలోనూ కేవలం లోపాలే కనిపిస్తాయా? మరోవైపు, ఎలాంటి సంచలనం సృష్టించకపోయినా సరే... సమాజంలో నిగూఢంగా ఉన్న ఆశ, పట్టుదల, ప్రగతి కథలను వెలికితీయడం కూడా మీ బాధ్యత అని మీరు నమ్ముతున్నారా? ఒక విమర్శకుడిగా ఉండటానికీ, ఒక విరోధిగా మారిపోవడానికీ మధ్య ఉన్న ఆ సన్నని గీతను మీరెలా గీస్తారు?