• "Do you trust the current media to report news without political bias?"
    "Do you trust the current media to report news without political bias?"
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 72 Views 0 Reviews
  • Your Feedback Matters!

    Bharat Aawaz | BMA (Bharat Media Association) We're a Start Up Dynamic Media House With High Vision and Deep Research With Hundreds of Reports at the Ground Level. Our Mission and Motive - Every Reporter Must Be Respected and Valued Everywhere, Properly.

    Their Work Should Be Excellent
    They Should also Have the Financial Stability
    Must be Strong: To Build Bharat

    We are Different From Everything, But Still We May Miss or Overlook Something. In Building Bharat Media, We Need Your Valuble Suggestions and FeedBack Always, in Everything.

    If You Find Anything Good, Join Our Vision to Support Us. If You Feel We Doing Something Wrong, Please Correct Us. Bharat Aawaz and BMA - Run By Only Members, Your Feedback Matters to Us, Always.

    To Rate Your Feedback, Just Please Send Us a Message with Both Good and Bad.

    Thank You!
    BMA | Bharat Aawaz

    Your Feedback Matters! Bharat Aawaz | BMA (Bharat Media Association) We're a Start Up Dynamic Media House With High Vision and Deep Research With Hundreds of Reports at the Ground Level. Our Mission and Motive - Every Reporter Must Be Respected and Valued Everywhere, Properly. Their Work Should Be Excellent They Should also Have the Financial Stability Must be Strong: To Build Bharat We are Different From Everything, But Still We May Miss or Overlook Something. In Building Bharat Media, We Need Your Valuble Suggestions and FeedBack Always, in Everything. If You Find Anything Good, Join Our Vision to Support Us. If You Feel We Doing Something Wrong, Please Correct Us. Bharat Aawaz and BMA - Run By Only Members, Your Feedback Matters to Us, Always. To Rate Your Feedback, Just Please Send Us a Message with Both Good and Bad. Thank You! BMA | Bharat Aawaz
    0 Comments 0 Shares 346 Views 0 Reviews
  • Do you believe media reporters and organizations in India are fulfilling their role responsibly in questioning power and informing the public?
    Do you believe media reporters and organizations in India are fulfilling their role responsibly in questioning power and informing the public?
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 229 Views 0 Reviews
  • Media: The Forth Estate
    We're Here to Question
    We Existin to Make the Legislative And Executive Systems Answerable.
    Are We Really Doing It ?

    Bharat Conclave. An Initiative to Make the Legislative System Answerable!
    https://youtu.be/gtrSHro6kHw?si=9vBT-wUjmRd4Z2CS
    Media: The Forth Estate We're Here to Question We Existin to Make the Legislative And Executive Systems Answerable. Are We Really Doing It ? Bharat Conclave. An Initiative to Make the Legislative System Answerable! https://youtu.be/gtrSHro6kHw?si=9vBT-wUjmRd4Z2CS
    0 Comments 0 Shares 243 Views 0 Reviews
  • This is Not Just a Media. It's Your Voice.
    https://youtu.be/PYMm3FAneHI?si=tyyLugZR0kftCiPp
    This is Not Just a Media. It's Your Voice. https://youtu.be/PYMm3FAneHI?si=tyyLugZR0kftCiPp
    0 Comments 0 Shares 167 Views 0 Reviews
  • The Voice Listens

    Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber?

    One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: เคญเคพเคฐเคค เค†เคตเคพเคœเคผ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed?

    The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle.

    With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join."

    The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums.

    Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise.

    When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy.

    Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them.

    Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist.

    As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight.

    She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?"

    The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release.

    Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims.

    Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    The Voice Listens Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber? One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: เคญเคพเคฐเคค เค†เคตเคพเคœเคผ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed? The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle. With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join." The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums. Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise. When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy. Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them. Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist. As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight. She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?" The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release. Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims. Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 695 Views 0 Reviews
  • Journalism has a Trust Problem. Ask Us Anything !

    The Long Story, Deep Research, Years of Observation, Intervention and Feedback from Thousands of Media People, Multiple Surveys, How the Media Organizations are Working, How the Media People are Being Treated, Where they Being Respected and Why they Loosing it, What are Financial Sources, What They Can do, What is Needed and What is Not Required, Like This, Hundreds and Thousands of Questions, Both Internally and Externally.

    With all Those, We Took 2 Years of Time, To Develope The Most Innovative, Transparent and Open Media Network with NEWS Broadcasting. For Fearless Journalism, For the Community and For the Journalists.

    Then and Now, We Got So Many Questions and Confusions, We Would Like to and Love To Share them all With You! And Ready to Answer all Your Questions also. Feel Free to Ask Anything, You're a Journalist! Questioning Should be Your Best Bet!

    This Would Help Us to Be More Transparent! To Learn More, and Even Improve More.

    Journalism has a Trust Problem. Ask Us Anything ! The Long Story, Deep Research, Years of Observation, Intervention and Feedback from Thousands of Media People, Multiple Surveys, How the Media Organizations are Working, How the Media People are Being Treated, Where they Being Respected and Why they Loosing it, What are Financial Sources, What They Can do, What is Needed and What is Not Required, Like This, Hundreds and Thousands of Questions, Both Internally and Externally. With all Those, We Took 2 Years of Time, To Develope The Most Innovative, Transparent and Open Media Network with NEWS Broadcasting. For Fearless Journalism, For the Community and For the Journalists. Then and Now, We Got So Many Questions and Confusions, We Would Like to and Love To Share them all With You! And Ready to Answer all Your Questions also. Feel Free to Ask Anything, You're a Journalist! Questioning Should be Your Best Bet! This Would Help Us to Be More Transparent! To Learn More, and Even Improve More.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 306 Views 0 Reviews
  • Do you think government welfare schemes are reaching every eligible person in your area and Media Professinals?
    ๐Ÿ’ฌ Do you think government welfare schemes are reaching every eligible person in your area and Media Professinals?
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 214 Views 0 Reviews
  • Do you believe citizen journalism (people reporting news through phones or social media) is helping or harming mainstream journalism?
    ๐Ÿ—ž๏ธ Do you believe citizen journalism (people reporting news through phones or social media) is helping or harming mainstream journalism?
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 361 Views 0 Reviews
  • "Should media platforms prioritize rural and local stories over mainstream political debates?"
    "Should media platforms prioritize rural and local stories over mainstream political debates?"
    0
    0
    1
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 290 Views 0 Reviews
  • “What immediate step should the authorities focus on after the Sigachi reactor blast yesterday (June 30, 2025)?”
    “What immediate step should the authorities focus on after the Sigachi reactor blast yesterday (June 30, 2025)?”
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 233 Views 0 Reviews
  • ๐.โ€ฏ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก – ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š....

    It was 1993 when P.โ€ฏSainath did something no mainstream journalist dared to do: he left the comforts of city life and spent 270 days a year for decades reporting from rural India—on foot, in tractors, on motorcycles—across the country’s poorest districts
    From Metro to Mud Roads

    Born in Chennai in 1957, Sainath was no rural native—but he felt a profound disconnect between media narratives and the agony of villages his compatriots lived in . When he first stepped into areas ravaged by drought in Tamil Nadu, Bihar, MP, Odisha, and Uttar Pradesh, he realized: Poverty was not an act of nature—it was man-made .

    With just a camera and his notebook, he exposed broken promises: schools without students; cows gifted to tribal families ending up in debt traps; dams built by uprooting entire communities for the profit of a few
    The Book That Shook the Nation: Everybody Loves a Good Drought

    In 1996, these stories were collected in Everybody Loves a Good Drought, a tightly woven tapestry of injustice and resilience. The title was sardonic—explaining how droughts became opportunities for graft. It became a Penguin classic, prescribed in hundreds of universities, and a catalyst for public debate.

    One village, Chikapar, saw three evictions by various government agencies—each time, people lost land, homes, and hope, while contractors walked away with large sums. These weren’t distant problems—they were part of India's story.

    ๐€๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐„๐ ๐จ—๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐€๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ
    Sainath’s uncompromising work earned him global recognition:
    • Amnesty International’s Human Rights Journalism Prize, 2000
    • Ramon Magsaysay Award, 2007 (for restoring rural lives to national focus)
    Yet he lived modestly—without corporate backing—financing his early field trips even by selling personal possessions.
    ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž’๐ฌ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š (๐๐€๐‘๐ˆ)
    In 2014, Sainath launched PARI, a digital, free-access platform dedicated to rural voices. It became a “living archive”—showcasing stories, videos, photos, and oral histories seldom covered by mainstream media.
    Volunteer-driven and multilingual, PARI documents everything from forgotten crafts to agrarian distress. It’s not just journalism; it’s a collective memory—and a weapon against invisibility
    ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก’๐ฌ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ
    • He redefined investigative journalism with emotional depth and factual courage .
    • He reminded us that India’s soul lives in its villages, and must not be overlooked.
    • He empowered us with the belief that a single journalist can spark systemic change.

    ๐€ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

    P.โ€ฏSainath didn’t just report—he walked through the droughts, debt, and dignity of rural India. He held up a mirror asking: What is development if it ignores those it claims to serve?

    ๐ŸŒพ ๐.โ€ฏ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก – ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š.... It was 1993 when P.โ€ฏSainath did something no mainstream journalist dared to do: he left the comforts of city life and spent 270 days a year for decades reporting from rural India—on foot, in tractors, on motorcycles—across the country’s poorest districts From Metro to Mud Roads Born in Chennai in 1957, Sainath was no rural native—but he felt a profound disconnect between media narratives and the agony of villages his compatriots lived in . When he first stepped into areas ravaged by drought in Tamil Nadu, Bihar, MP, Odisha, and Uttar Pradesh, he realized: Poverty was not an act of nature—it was man-made . With just a camera and his notebook, he exposed broken promises: schools without students; cows gifted to tribal families ending up in debt traps; dams built by uprooting entire communities for the profit of a few The Book That Shook the Nation: Everybody Loves a Good Drought In 1996, these stories were collected in Everybody Loves a Good Drought, a tightly woven tapestry of injustice and resilience. The title was sardonic—explaining how droughts became opportunities for graft. It became a Penguin classic, prescribed in hundreds of universities, and a catalyst for public debate. One village, Chikapar, saw three evictions by various government agencies—each time, people lost land, homes, and hope, while contractors walked away with large sums. These weren’t distant problems—they were part of India's story. ๐Ÿ… ๐€๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐„๐ ๐จ—๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐€๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ Sainath’s uncompromising work earned him global recognition: • Amnesty International’s Human Rights Journalism Prize, 2000 • Ramon Magsaysay Award, 2007 (for restoring rural lives to national focus) Yet he lived modestly—without corporate backing—financing his early field trips even by selling personal possessions. ๐Ÿ“š ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž’๐ฌ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š (๐๐€๐‘๐ˆ) In 2014, Sainath launched PARI, a digital, free-access platform dedicated to rural voices. It became a “living archive”—showcasing stories, videos, photos, and oral histories seldom covered by mainstream media. Volunteer-driven and multilingual, PARI documents everything from forgotten crafts to agrarian distress. It’s not just journalism; it’s a collective memory—and a weapon against invisibility ๐ŸŒŸ ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก’๐ฌ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ • He redefined investigative journalism with emotional depth and factual courage . • He reminded us that India’s soul lives in its villages, and must not be overlooked. • He empowered us with the belief that a single journalist can spark systemic change. ๐€ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ P.โ€ฏSainath didn’t just report—he walked through the droughts, debt, and dignity of rural India. He held up a mirror asking: What is development if it ignores those it claims to serve?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 703 Views 0 Reviews
More Results
BMA | Bharat Aawaz | IINNSIDE https://bma.bharatmediaassociation.com