• Which power do you believe is most underused in India?"

    Tell us why! Your voice matters more than ever.

    This poll isn't just a vote — it's a wake-up call. If democracy is a shared responsibility, which part are we ignoring?
    Which power do you believe is most underused in India?" Tell us why! Your voice matters more than ever. This poll isn't just a vote — it's a wake-up call. If democracy is a shared responsibility, which part are we ignoring?
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 82 Views 0 Reviews
  • Do you believe media reporters and organizations in India are fulfilling their role responsibly in questioning power and informing the public?
    Do you believe media reporters and organizations in India are fulfilling their role responsibly in questioning power and informing the public?
    0
    1
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 195 Views 0 Reviews
  • The Voice Listens

    Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber?

    One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: เคญเคพเคฐเคค เค†เคตเคพเคœเคผ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed?

    The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle.

    With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join."

    The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums.

    Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise.

    When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy.

    Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them.

    Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist.

    As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight.

    She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?"

    The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release.

    Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims.

    Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    The Voice Listens Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber? One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: เคญเคพเคฐเคค เค†เคตเคพเคœเคผ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed? The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle. With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join." The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums. Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise. When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy. Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them. Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist. As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight. She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?" The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release. Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims. Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 616 Views 0 Reviews
  • *เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฑ Vs. เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐกเฐฟเฐฏเฐพ: เฐชเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฑ‡เฐฏเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฑเฐฅเฐพเฐจเฐ‚ เฐŽเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฐก?*
    ( *Bharat Vs. India: Where is the Journalist's Position?* )

    In the ongoing debate between 'India' and 'Bharat', journalists are often accused of being part of an elite, out-of-touch circle. This question is about your own position in this divide.

    When you travel from the city to the village, from your world to theirs, do you see your primary role as being a 'voice for the voiceless', which risks speaking for them? Or is it to be a 'microphone for their voices', which requires you to step back and cede the narrative?

    Furthermore, how do you personally guard against your reporting becoming a form of 'extractive tourism'—where you simply take their stories of struggle for your urban audience and then leave—versus creating a space that truly reflects their agency, intelligence, and aspirations, not just their victimhood?

    'เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐกเฐฟเฐฏเฐพ', 'เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฑ' เฐฎเฐงเฑเฐฏ เฐœเฐฐเฑเฐ—เฑเฐคเฑเฐจเฑเฐจ เฐˆ เฐšเฐฐเฑเฐšเฐฒเฑ‹, เฐœเฐฐเฑเฐจเฐฒเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐคเฐฐเฐšเฑเฐ—เฐพ เฐตเฐพเฐธเฑเฐคเฐตเฐพเฐจเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐฆเฑ‚เฐฐเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐกเฑ‡ เฐ’เฐ• เฐ‰เฐจเฑเฐจเฐค เฐตเฐฐเฑเฐ—เฐชเฑ เฐฌเฑเฐกเฐ—เฐฒเฑ‹ เฐœเฑ€เฐตเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐคเฐพเฐฐเฐจเฐฟ เฐ’เฐ• เฐตเฐฟเฐฎเฐฐเฑเฐถ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐฆเฐฟ. เฐˆ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจ เฐ† เฐตเฐฟเฐญเฐœเฐจเฐฒเฑ‹ เฐฎเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐฅเฐพเฐจเฐ‚ เฐ—เฑเฐฐเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฑ‡.

    เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ เฐจเฐ—เฐฐเฐ‚ เฐจเฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ เฐชเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฑ†เฐ•เฑ, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐชเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚ เฐจเฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐชเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐฒเฑ‹เฐ•เฐฟ เฐตเฑ†เฐณเฑเฐณเฐฟเฐจเฐชเฑเฐชเฑเฐกเฑ, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐฅเฐฎเฐฟเฐ• เฐชเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐ เฐเฐฎเฐฟเฐŸเฐฟ? เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐคเฐฐเฐชเฑเฐจ เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐฎเฐพเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฐพเฐกเฑ‡ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐพเฐฆเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐคเฑ€เฐธเฑเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‚ 'เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ‡เฐจเฐฟเฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•เฐตเฑเฐตเฐกเฐฎเฐพ'? เฐฒเฑ‡เฐ• เฐ•เฐฅเฐจเฐ‚เฐชเฑˆ เฐชเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑ เฐตเฐฆเฑเฐฒเฑเฐ•เฑเฐจเฐฟ, เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐฒเฐ•เฑ 'เฐ•เฑ‡เฐตเฐฒเฐ‚ เฐ’เฐ• เฐฎเฑˆเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฑ‹เฐซเฑ‹เฐจเฑ‌เฐ—เฐพ' เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฐกเฐฎเฐพ?

    เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐ•เฐพ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐพเฐฒเฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‡, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐฐเฐฟเฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐ‚เฐ—เฑ... เฐ•เฑ‡เฐตเฐฒเฐ‚ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ•เฐทเฑเฐŸเฐพเฐฒเฐจเฑ เฐ•เฐฅเฐฒเฑเฐ—เฐพ เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐšเฐฟ, เฐจเฐ—เฐฐ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฑ‡เฐ•เฑเฐทเฐ•เฑเฐฒเฐ•เฑ เฐ…เฐฎเฑเฐฎเฑเฐ•เฑŠเฐจเฐฟ เฐตเฑ†เฐณเฑเฐณเฐฟเฐชเฑ‹เฐฏเฑ‡ 'เฐŽเฐ•เฑเฐธเฑ‌เฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐ•เฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐตเฑ เฐŸเฑ‚เฐฐเฐฟเฐœเฐ‚' เฐ•เฐพเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐพ... เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐฌเฐพเฐงเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐตเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐฎเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐฎเฑ‡ เฐ•เฐพเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐพ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ…เฐธเฑเฐคเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐตเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ, เฐคเฑ†เฐฒเฐฟเฐตเฐฟเฐจเฐฟ, เฐ†เฐ•เฐพเฐ‚เฐ•เฑเฐทเฐฒเฐจเฑ เฐจเฐฟเฐœเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐคเฐฟเฐฌเฐฟเฐ‚เฐฌเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฑ‡เฐฒเฐพ เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ†เฐฒเฐพ เฐœเฐพเฐ—เฑเฐฐเฐคเฑเฐคเฐชเฐกเฐคเฐพเฐฐเฑ?
    *เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฑ Vs. เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐกเฐฟเฐฏเฐพ: เฐชเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฑ‡เฐฏเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐธเฑเฐฅเฐพเฐจเฐ‚ เฐŽเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฐก?* ( *Bharat Vs. India: Where is the Journalist's Position?* ) In the ongoing debate between 'India' and 'Bharat', journalists are often accused of being part of an elite, out-of-touch circle. This question is about your own position in this divide. When you travel from the city to the village, from your world to theirs, do you see your primary role as being a 'voice for the voiceless', which risks speaking for them? Or is it to be a 'microphone for their voices', which requires you to step back and cede the narrative? Furthermore, how do you personally guard against your reporting becoming a form of 'extractive tourism'—where you simply take their stories of struggle for your urban audience and then leave—versus creating a space that truly reflects their agency, intelligence, and aspirations, not just their victimhood? 'เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐกเฐฟเฐฏเฐพ', 'เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฑ' เฐฎเฐงเฑเฐฏ เฐœเฐฐเฑเฐ—เฑเฐคเฑเฐจเฑเฐจ เฐˆ เฐšเฐฐเฑเฐšเฐฒเฑ‹, เฐœเฐฐเฑเฐจเฐฒเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฑ เฐคเฐฐเฐšเฑเฐ—เฐพ เฐตเฐพเฐธเฑเฐคเฐตเฐพเฐจเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐฆเฑ‚เฐฐเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐกเฑ‡ เฐ’เฐ• เฐ‰เฐจเฑเฐจเฐค เฐตเฐฐเฑเฐ—เฐชเฑ เฐฌเฑเฐกเฐ—เฐฒเฑ‹ เฐœเฑ€เฐตเฐฟเฐธเฑเฐคเฐพเฐฐเฐจเฐฟ เฐ’เฐ• เฐตเฐฟเฐฎเฐฐเฑเฐถ เฐ‰เฐ‚เฐฆเฐฟ. เฐˆ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจ เฐ† เฐตเฐฟเฐญเฐœเฐจเฐฒเฑ‹ เฐฎเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐฅเฐพเฐจเฐ‚ เฐ—เฑเฐฐเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฑ‡. เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ เฐจเฐ—เฐฐเฐ‚ เฐจเฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ เฐชเฐฒเฑเฐฒเฑ†เฐ•เฑ, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐชเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚ เฐจเฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐชเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐฒเฑ‹เฐ•เฐฟ เฐตเฑ†เฐณเฑเฐณเฐฟเฐจเฐชเฑเฐชเฑเฐกเฑ, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐฅเฐฎเฐฟเฐ• เฐชเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐ เฐเฐฎเฐฟเฐŸเฐฟ? เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐคเฐฐเฐชเฑเฐจ เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐฎเฐพเฐŸเฑเฐฒเฐพเฐกเฑ‡ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐฎเฐพเฐฆเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐคเฑ€เฐธเฑเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‚ 'เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ‡เฐจเฐฟเฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟเฐ•เฐฟ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•เฐตเฑเฐตเฐกเฐฎเฐพ'? เฐฒเฑ‡เฐ• เฐ•เฐฅเฐจเฐ‚เฐชเฑˆ เฐชเฐŸเฑเฐŸเฑ เฐตเฐฆเฑเฐฒเฑเฐ•เฑเฐจเฐฟ, เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐฒเฐ•เฑ 'เฐ•เฑ‡เฐตเฐฒเฐ‚ เฐ’เฐ• เฐฎเฑˆเฐ•เฑเฐฐเฑ‹เฐซเฑ‹เฐจเฑ‌เฐ—เฐพ' เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฐกเฐฎเฐพ? เฐ‡เฐ‚เฐ•เฐพ เฐšเฑ†เฐชเฑเฐชเฐพเฐฒเฐ‚เฐŸเฑ‡, เฐฎเฑ€ เฐฐเฐฟเฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐ‚เฐ—เฑ... เฐ•เฑ‡เฐตเฐฒเฐ‚ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ•เฐทเฑเฐŸเฐพเฐฒเฐจเฑ เฐ•เฐฅเฐฒเฑเฐ—เฐพ เฐฎเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐšเฐฟ, เฐจเฐ—เฐฐ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฑ‡เฐ•เฑเฐทเฐ•เฑเฐฒเฐ•เฑ เฐ…เฐฎเฑเฐฎเฑเฐ•เฑŠเฐจเฐฟ เฐตเฑ†เฐณเฑเฐณเฐฟเฐชเฑ‹เฐฏเฑ‡ 'เฐŽเฐ•เฑเฐธเฑ‌เฐŸเฑเฐฐเฐพเฐ•เฑเฐŸเฐฟเฐตเฑ เฐŸเฑ‚เฐฐเฐฟเฐœเฐ‚' เฐ•เฐพเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐพ... เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐฌเฐพเฐงเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐตเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ เฐฎเฐพเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐฎเฑ‡ เฐ•เฐพเฐ•เฑเฐ‚เฐกเฐพ เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฐฟ เฐ…เฐธเฑเฐคเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐตเฐพเฐจเฑเฐจเฐฟ, เฐคเฑ†เฐฒเฐฟเฐตเฐฟเฐจเฐฟ, เฐ†เฐ•เฐพเฐ‚เฐ•เฑเฐทเฐฒเฐจเฑ เฐจเฐฟเฐœเฐ‚เฐ—เฐพ เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐคเฐฟเฐฌเฐฟเฐ‚เฐฌเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฑ‡เฐฒเฐพ เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ†เฐฒเฐพ เฐœเฐพเฐ—เฑเฐฐเฐคเฑเฐคเฐชเฐกเฐคเฐพเฐฐเฑ?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 247 Views 0 Reviews
  • In an environment where the lines between patriotism and journalism are constantly tested, and where institutional and commercial pressures are immense, have you ever faced a moment where you had to choose between the truth that India needs to hear and the story that your audience, your management, or the nation wants to hear?

    In that moment of conflict, who—or what—is your ultimate allegiance to?
    In an environment where the lines between patriotism and journalism are constantly tested, and where institutional and commercial pressures are immense, have you ever faced a moment where you had to choose between the truth that India needs to hear and the story that your audience, your management, or the nation wants to hear? In that moment of conflict, who—or what—is your ultimate allegiance to?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 199 Views 0 Reviews
  • “Do you support the idea of ‘One Nation, One Election’ in India, aligning general and state elections together?”
    “Do you support the idea of ‘One Nation, One Election’ in India, aligning general and state elections together?”
    2
    0
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 192 Views 0 Reviews
  • “Think Big! You're the Face of the Nation and Voice Of India. NEWS, Investigations, Fact Finding, Collaberation, Awareness Creation, Questions and Fight - For Freedom & Rights!”

    “เฐ—เฑŠเฐชเฑเฐชเฐ—เฐพ เฐ†เฐฒเฑ‹เฐšเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ! เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐˆ เฐฆเฑ‡เฐถ เฐฎเฑเฐ–เฐšเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐ‚, เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฐฆเฑ‡เฐถเฐชเฑ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•. เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฒเฑ, เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐพเฐชเฑเฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ, เฐจเฐฟเฐœ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐงเฐพเฐฐเฐฃ, เฐธเฐฎเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐฟ เฐ•เฑƒเฐทเฐฟ, เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฐพเฐŸเฐ‚... เฐ…เฐจเฑเฐจเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐตเฑ‡เฐšเฑเฐ› เฐฎเฐฐเฐฟเฐฏเฑ เฐนเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฑเฐฒ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐฎเฑ‡!”

    — Bharat Aawaz

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9vlwvItKwo
    “Think Big! You're the Face of the Nation and Voice Of India. NEWS, Investigations, Fact Finding, Collaberation, Awareness Creation, Questions and Fight - For Freedom & Rights!” “เฐ—เฑŠเฐชเฑเฐชเฐ—เฐพ เฐ†เฐฒเฑ‹เฐšเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ! เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐˆ เฐฆเฑ‡เฐถ เฐฎเฑเฐ–เฐšเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐ‚, เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฐฆเฑ‡เฐถเฐชเฑ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•. เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฒเฑ, เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐพเฐชเฑเฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ, เฐจเฐฟเฐœ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐงเฐพเฐฐเฐฃ, เฐธเฐฎเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐฟ เฐ•เฑƒเฐทเฐฟ, เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฐพเฐŸเฐ‚... เฐ…เฐจเฑเฐจเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐตเฑ‡เฐšเฑเฐ› เฐฎเฐฐเฐฟเฐฏเฑ เฐนเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฑเฐฒ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐฎเฑ‡!” — Bharat Aawaz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9vlwvItKwo
    0 Comments 0 Shares 348 Views 0 Reviews
  • “Think Big! You're the Face of the Nation and Voice Of India. NEWS, Investigations, Fact Finding, Collaberation, Awareness Creation, Questions and Fight - For Freedom & Rights!”

    “เฐ—เฑŠเฐชเฑเฐชเฐ—เฐพ เฐ†เฐฒเฑ‹เฐšเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ! เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐˆ เฐฆเฑ‡เฐถ เฐฎเฑเฐ–เฐšเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐ‚, เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฐฆเฑ‡เฐถเฐชเฑ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•. เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฒเฑ, เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐพเฐชเฑเฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ, เฐจเฐฟเฐœ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐงเฐพเฐฐเฐฃ, เฐธเฐฎเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐฟ เฐ•เฑƒเฐทเฐฟ, เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฐพเฐŸเฐ‚... เฐ…เฐจเฑเฐจเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐตเฑ‡เฐšเฑเฐ› เฐฎเฐฐเฐฟเฐฏเฑ เฐนเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฑเฐฒ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐฎเฑ‡!”

    — Bharat Aawaz

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9vlwvItKwo
    “Think Big! You're the Face of the Nation and Voice Of India. NEWS, Investigations, Fact Finding, Collaberation, Awareness Creation, Questions and Fight - For Freedom & Rights!” “เฐ—เฑŠเฐชเฑเฐชเฐ—เฐพ เฐ†เฐฒเฑ‹เฐšเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐ‚เฐกเฐฟ! เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐˆ เฐฆเฑ‡เฐถ เฐฎเฑเฐ–เฐšเฐฟเฐคเฑเฐฐเฐ‚, เฐฎเฑ€เฐฐเฑ‡ เฐญเฐพเฐฐเฐคเฐฆเฑ‡เฐถเฐชเฑ เฐ—เฑŠเฐ‚เฐคเฑเฐ•. เฐตเฐพเฐฐเฑเฐคเฐฒเฑ, เฐฆเฐฐเฑเฐฏเฐพเฐชเฑเฐคเฑเฐฒเฑ, เฐจเฐฟเฐœ เฐจเฐฟเฐฐเฑเฐงเฐพเฐฐเฐฃ, เฐธเฐฎเฐฟเฐทเฑเฐŸเฐฟ เฐ•เฑƒเฐทเฐฟ, เฐ…เฐตเฐ—เฐพเฐนเฐจ เฐ•เฐฒเฑเฐชเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑเฐฐเฐถเฑเฐจเฐฟเฐ‚เฐšเฐกเฐ‚, เฐชเฑ‹เฐฐเฐพเฐŸเฐ‚... เฐ…เฐจเฑเฐจเฑ€ เฐธเฑเฐตเฑ‡เฐšเฑเฐ› เฐฎเฐฐเฐฟเฐฏเฑ เฐนเฐ•เฑเฐ•เฑเฐฒ เฐ•เฑ‹เฐธเฐฎเฑ‡!” — Bharat Aawaz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9vlwvItKwo
    0 Comments 0 Shares 397 Views 0 Reviews
  • ๐.โ€ฏ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก – ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š....

    It was 1993 when P.โ€ฏSainath did something no mainstream journalist dared to do: he left the comforts of city life and spent 270 days a year for decades reporting from rural India—on foot, in tractors, on motorcycles—across the country’s poorest districts
    From Metro to Mud Roads

    Born in Chennai in 1957, Sainath was no rural native—but he felt a profound disconnect between media narratives and the agony of villages his compatriots lived in . When he first stepped into areas ravaged by drought in Tamil Nadu, Bihar, MP, Odisha, and Uttar Pradesh, he realized: Poverty was not an act of nature—it was man-made .

    With just a camera and his notebook, he exposed broken promises: schools without students; cows gifted to tribal families ending up in debt traps; dams built by uprooting entire communities for the profit of a few
    The Book That Shook the Nation: Everybody Loves a Good Drought

    In 1996, these stories were collected in Everybody Loves a Good Drought, a tightly woven tapestry of injustice and resilience. The title was sardonic—explaining how droughts became opportunities for graft. It became a Penguin classic, prescribed in hundreds of universities, and a catalyst for public debate.

    One village, Chikapar, saw three evictions by various government agencies—each time, people lost land, homes, and hope, while contractors walked away with large sums. These weren’t distant problems—they were part of India's story.

    ๐€๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐„๐ ๐จ—๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐€๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ
    Sainath’s uncompromising work earned him global recognition:
    • Amnesty International’s Human Rights Journalism Prize, 2000
    • Ramon Magsaysay Award, 2007 (for restoring rural lives to national focus)
    Yet he lived modestly—without corporate backing—financing his early field trips even by selling personal possessions.
    ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž’๐ฌ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š (๐๐€๐‘๐ˆ)
    In 2014, Sainath launched PARI, a digital, free-access platform dedicated to rural voices. It became a “living archive”—showcasing stories, videos, photos, and oral histories seldom covered by mainstream media.
    Volunteer-driven and multilingual, PARI documents everything from forgotten crafts to agrarian distress. It’s not just journalism; it’s a collective memory—and a weapon against invisibility
    ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก’๐ฌ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ
    • He redefined investigative journalism with emotional depth and factual courage .
    • He reminded us that India’s soul lives in its villages, and must not be overlooked.
    • He empowered us with the belief that a single journalist can spark systemic change.

    ๐€ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐

    P.โ€ฏSainath didn’t just report—he walked through the droughts, debt, and dignity of rural India. He held up a mirror asking: What is development if it ignores those it claims to serve?

    ๐ŸŒพ ๐.โ€ฏ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก – ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐–๐ก๐จ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š.... It was 1993 when P.โ€ฏSainath did something no mainstream journalist dared to do: he left the comforts of city life and spent 270 days a year for decades reporting from rural India—on foot, in tractors, on motorcycles—across the country’s poorest districts From Metro to Mud Roads Born in Chennai in 1957, Sainath was no rural native—but he felt a profound disconnect between media narratives and the agony of villages his compatriots lived in . When he first stepped into areas ravaged by drought in Tamil Nadu, Bihar, MP, Odisha, and Uttar Pradesh, he realized: Poverty was not an act of nature—it was man-made . With just a camera and his notebook, he exposed broken promises: schools without students; cows gifted to tribal families ending up in debt traps; dams built by uprooting entire communities for the profit of a few The Book That Shook the Nation: Everybody Loves a Good Drought In 1996, these stories were collected in Everybody Loves a Good Drought, a tightly woven tapestry of injustice and resilience. The title was sardonic—explaining how droughts became opportunities for graft. It became a Penguin classic, prescribed in hundreds of universities, and a catalyst for public debate. One village, Chikapar, saw three evictions by various government agencies—each time, people lost land, homes, and hope, while contractors walked away with large sums. These weren’t distant problems—they were part of India's story. ๐Ÿ… ๐€๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐„๐ ๐จ—๐…๐จ๐ซ ๐€๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ Sainath’s uncompromising work earned him global recognition: • Amnesty International’s Human Rights Journalism Prize, 2000 • Ramon Magsaysay Award, 2007 (for restoring rural lives to national focus) Yet he lived modestly—without corporate backing—financing his early field trips even by selling personal possessions. ๐Ÿ“š ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž’๐ฌ ๐€๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐‘๐ฎ๐ซ๐š๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐๐ข๐š (๐๐€๐‘๐ˆ) In 2014, Sainath launched PARI, a digital, free-access platform dedicated to rural voices. It became a “living archive”—showcasing stories, videos, photos, and oral histories seldom covered by mainstream media. Volunteer-driven and multilingual, PARI documents everything from forgotten crafts to agrarian distress. It’s not just journalism; it’s a collective memory—and a weapon against invisibility ๐ŸŒŸ ๐–๐ก๐ฒ ๐’๐š๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ก’๐ฌ ๐’๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฒ ๐’๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฉ๐ข๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ • He redefined investigative journalism with emotional depth and factual courage . • He reminded us that India’s soul lives in its villages, and must not be overlooked. • He empowered us with the belief that a single journalist can spark systemic change. ๐€ ๐–๐š๐ฅ๐ค ๐“๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐†๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ P.โ€ฏSainath didn’t just report—he walked through the droughts, debt, and dignity of rural India. He held up a mirror asking: What is development if it ignores those it claims to serve?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 664 Views 0 Reviews
  • Do you think India has truly learned from the 1975 Emergency?



    50 years later… are we free, or just comfortable with control?
    Do you think India has truly learned from the 1975 Emergency? ๐Ÿ“š 50 years later… are we free, or just comfortable with control?
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0 Comments 0 Shares 249 Views 0 Reviews
  • https://x.com/JoshiPralhad/status/1935286998794989574?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1935286998794989574%7Ctwgr%5E83ce8a7405d18a08de6711615aa08e1f6137b11c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftimesofindia.indiatimes.com%2Findia%2Fone-nation-one-time-indias-new-official-time-zone-govt-makes-ist-mandatory-for-all-legal-and-digital-systems%2Farticleshow%2F121934402.cms
    https://x.com/JoshiPralhad/status/1935286998794989574?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1935286998794989574%7Ctwgr%5E83ce8a7405d18a08de6711615aa08e1f6137b11c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftimesofindia.indiatimes.com%2Findia%2Fone-nation-one-time-indias-new-official-time-zone-govt-makes-ist-mandatory-for-all-legal-and-digital-systems%2Farticleshow%2F121934402.cms
    0 Comments 0 Shares 339 Views 0 Reviews
  • Know Your Rights – The Power of Being an Informed Citizen

    Every Indian citizen is not just a voter or taxpayer — but a powerful stakeholder in the world’s largest democracy. The Constitution of India grants every citizen a set of Fundamental Rights that ensure dignity, freedom, and justice.

    Right to Equality – You have the right to be treated equally before the law. No discrimination based on religion, caste, gender, or status.

    Right to Freedom – Express your opinions, move freely, live anywhere, or practice any profession. This is the backbone of a free society.

    Right Against Exploitation – No one can force you into bonded labor or exploit you for profit.

    Right to Freedom of Religion – You are free to believe, worship, and follow any faith.

    Cultural & Educational Rights – Every community has the right to preserve its culture and access education without discrimination.

    Right to Constitutional Remedies – If your rights are violated, the courts are open to protect you. You can file petitions, demand justice, and even use tools like the RTI Act to seek truth.

    Why It Matters:
    A well-informed citizen is the strongest pillar of democracy. When you know your rights, you cannot be misled, suppressed, or silenced. Stand for yourself. Speak for others. Be the voice of fairness and truth.

    Join initiatives like Bharat Media Association to empower yourself with legal knowledge, RTI skills, and ethical journalism tools.
    Know Your Rights – The Power of Being an Informed Citizen Every Indian citizen is not just a voter or taxpayer — but a powerful stakeholder in the world’s largest democracy. The Constitution of India grants every citizen a set of Fundamental Rights that ensure dignity, freedom, and justice. โœ… Right to Equality – You have the right to be treated equally before the law. No discrimination based on religion, caste, gender, or status. โœ… Right to Freedom – Express your opinions, move freely, live anywhere, or practice any profession. This is the backbone of a free society. โœ… Right Against Exploitation – No one can force you into bonded labor or exploit you for profit. โœ… Right to Freedom of Religion – You are free to believe, worship, and follow any faith. โœ… Cultural & Educational Rights – Every community has the right to preserve its culture and access education without discrimination. โœ… Right to Constitutional Remedies – If your rights are violated, the courts are open to protect you. You can file petitions, demand justice, and even use tools like the RTI Act to seek truth. Why It Matters: A well-informed citizen is the strongest pillar of democracy. When you know your rights, you cannot be misled, suppressed, or silenced. Stand for yourself. Speak for others. Be the voice of fairness and truth. Join initiatives like Bharat Media Association to empower yourself with legal knowledge, RTI skills, and ethical journalism tools.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 813 Views 0 Reviews
More Results
BMA | Bharat Aawaz | IINNSIDE https://bma.bharatmediaassociation.com